Wednesday, August 30, 2006

Assorted Oddities…

Save the Net


Don’t forget to check some of my favorite blogs:

http://evenlittlesparrows.blogspot.com/  - Sparrow Chat
http://derenegade.blogspot.com/  -
Dependable Renegade
http://www.crooksandliars.com/ - Crooks and Liars
http://www.thinkprogress.org/  -
Think Progess
http://priceofliberty.net   - The Price of Liberty is Vigilance
http://www.nocapital.blogspot.com/  - No Capital
http://cernigsnewshog.blogspot.com/ - NewsHog
http://www.cursor.org  - Cursor
http://www.mockpaperscissors.com/ - Mock, Paper, Scissors
http://tumblingvice.blogspot.com/ - Tumbling Vice
http://bobgeiger.blogspot.com/ - BobGeiger (formerly Yellow Dog)
http://left-over.blogspot.com/ - Left-Over


Glossary for newcomers:

Chief of the Counterfeit Compassionate Conservative And Oh Yeah By The Way Conspicuously Caucasian Caucus = George W. Bush
Dither of Dolts = The Bush Administration and heads of agencies
Lint Twins = The Bush twins, who, like lint, are neither useful nor decorative
Shithead = Karl Rove.  To save typographer’s labor and print space, this combines the two soubriquets frequently applied to Mr. Rove: Bush’s Brain + Turd Blossom = Shithead 
XianXrazies  = Any group professing to be Christian which believes the faith excludes any of humanity from the hope it presumably offers since Christ’s sacrifice or which believes it has successfully learned to read God’s mind or which believes God wants followers who are drafted or gathered by impressment or which believes God hates or wants anyone else to hate those who do not believe in Him.
Ambulatory Emetic = Condi Rice, Secretary of State, aka the cacophagous, fawning bitch cur that slithers and crawls behind her master. A gourmand of whatever shit he deposits, she mixes it with her venomous digestive juices, then vomits it forth before the leaders of the world.
 

                                          —o0o—

Assorted oddities…

Sometimes lately my life is a little like the marvelously anticlimactic line in Shelley’s “Indian Serenade”:  I die, I faint, I fail.

That is to say, immediately after a chemo session, I have a spell of fatigue which suggests the bright light at the end of a long tunnel will be appearing momentarily and would be welcome.  That’s followed by a period in which my bed and I become bosom buddies, hurling back into each other’s embrace after short intervals of separation.  The last stage is this one…in which I note that I have failed to blog myself, instead treating myself to long excursions (and frequently long comments) in the blogs of others.  (Some of those I visit most frequently are listed above.)  Usually those blogs have already noted most of what I consider noteworthy, so anything of mine would be a redundancy at best.

But there are always a few things which get through my mental mists eventually.  Here are a couple of them:

1.  SAT Scores Take Sharp Drop - Class Of 2006 Registers Largest Decrease In Three Decades , which certainly suggests that if no one child is being left behind, then all children must have fallen far behind their seniors.  I’m not sure unanimity in lowered expectation was the goal of “No Child Left Behind”, but it appears increasingly that’s what it has achieved.  Perhaps children look at Mr. Bush and think, “Okay, even if I’m not smart enough or well-educated enough to get a job pumping gas or flipping burgers, I can always be elected President.”

Various possible explanations are offered for the decline in scores — a change in the test itself, fatigue occasioned by the length of the test, and the rising cost of the test, which has reduced the number of students taking it twice.  Another explanation is that the schools are a mess, that teachers are inadequately compensated and frequently inadequately trained, that parents are losing the battle to peer pressures on students, etc., etc., etc.  No matter how hard I try, it’s hard for me to believe a chronic academic under-achiever like Mr. Bush will ever provide — or appoint anyone who can provide — reasonable steps to halt the backward drift. 

Take a trip to Sparrow Chat’s Now, Some Things for an interesting and (I think) amusing look at Mr. Bush’s usefulness as an incentive to education. As I said in my comment there, if
Princeton had the nerve, it would probably be advertising widely that Mr. Bush is a product of Yale and Harvard.

2.  Abu Ghraib Prison Totally Empty Official Says No Detainees Left At Notorious Iraqi Prison, which contains the interesting information

U.S. military officials had said they have always had the intention to move detainees from Abu Ghraib because it is in a region susceptible to attacks and was difficult to support logistically.

More than 13,000 detainees are being held at coalition facilities, in Camps Cropper, Bucca, and Fort Suse. Many detainees are awaiting trial, others formal charges.

A committee consisting of U.S. and Iraqi officials from the ministries of human rights, justice and interior has reviewed the cases of more than 30,000 detainees and recommended more than 15,400 for release.


The arithmetic of that final paragraph is unsettling.  More than half the detainees, in other words, apparently should never have been there.

I wonder if the Bush budget has allocated funds to hire temps to do the letters of apology to those 15,400?

3.  Richer for poorer - Though their numbers remain steady, the lot of America’s poor may be improving in ways not reflected by the official figures, which takes a look at the recently released Census Bureau report and makes some interesting points.  However, after its “things aren’t really so bad” tone, the article concludes:

Some critics of the government’s poverty figures argue that the impression they give is too gloomy. Nicholas Eberstadt of the American Enterprise Institute, a free-market think-tank, points out that official poverty calculations exclude taxes paid and government benefits received as well as non-cash income such as fringe benefits or the rent saved through homeownership. This leads to a growing mismatch between the official poverty rate and spending by those at the bottom, which has risen though the poverty rate has held steady.

Mr Eberstadt points out that while nutrition, adequate shelter and health care were big problems for the poor when America’s poverty measure was devised, the picture is different today. Obesity is now the chief nutritional woe facing America’s poor. And those under the poverty line now have nearly as much house space and amenities as the average family in 1980. This does not mean that the poor are leading lives of plenty but it does indicate that their lot is getting steadily better, an improvement not reflected in official figures.

It may get even harder to assess the true state of America’s poor. The census report notes that its Survey of Income and Programme Participation is being “re-engineered” in a way that will provide less data than the current version. Mark Kleiman, a professor of public policy at UCLA, attributes this to a “blind the beast” strategy by those Republicans who are determined to prevent the government from collecting any data on issues that it might then have to tackle. Though the poor may still be with them, in the future Americans will be less aware of it.

Once again, it’s the final paragraph that causes some rising of the short hair at the back of my neck.  The GOPer talent for re-defining reality and then marketing the sham to carefully selected members of the human herd is well-known.  I’ve always maintained the GOP consists of piss-poor policy-makers but wonderful marketers — packaging and market targeting may not be noble skills, but in politics, they are obviously very useful.

4.  And as though to prove that final point for me, we have this:

Rumsfeld: World Faces New ‘Fascism’ - Defense Secretary Likens Iraq War Opponents To Those Who Appeased Hitler .  Here’s a snippet:

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Tuesday the world faces “a new type of fascism” and likened critics of the Bush administration’s war strategy to those who tried to appease the Nazis in the 1930s.

In unusually explicit terms, Rumsfeld portrayed the administration’s critics as suffering from “moral or intellectual confusion” about what threatens the nation’s security. His remarks amounted to one of his most pointed defenses of President Bush’ war policies and was among his toughest attacks on Bush’s critics.

Speaking to several thousand veterans at the American Legion’s national convention [xm note: in Salt Lake City, Utah], Rumsfeld recited what he called the lessons of history, including the failure to confront Hitler. He quoted Winston Churchill as observing that trying to accommodate Hitler was “a bit like feeding a crocodile, hoping it would eat you last.”

As I said, targeted marketing is a big part of any GOP success story.  Such a speech before the American Legion in Salt Lake City probably drew applause.  I hope there are still cities in this misguided, foundering nation where it would have drawn cat-calls, cabbages, and over-ripe fruit.

I suggest Mr. Rumsfeld withdraw his head from his anal cavity long enough to take a look at Umberto Eco’s Eternal Fascism: - Fourteen Ways of Looking at a Blackshirt.   

Or, of course, he could just look in a mirror.

Update Keith Olbermann has delivered a response to Mr. Rumsfeld’s outrageous comments.  Read the transcript AND watch the video!

Update:  Mayor Rocky Anderson’s speech in Salt Lake City is another impressive retort to Mr. Rumsfeld’s offensive speech.  Check it out. 





Posted by xristim in 20:26:56 | Permalink | Comments (10)

Friday, August 11, 2006

A twilight tinge…


Save the Net

Don’t forget to check some of my favorite blogs:

http://priceofliberty.net   - The Price of Liberty is Vigilance
http://evenlittlesparrows.blogspot.com/  - Sparrow Chat
http://www.crooksandliars.com/ - Crooks and Liars
http://www.thinkprogress.org/  -
Think Progess
http://www.nocapital.blogspot.com/  - No Capital
http://cernigsnewshog.blogspot.com/ - NewsHog
http://www.cursor.org  - Cursor
http://www.mockpaperscissors.com/ - Mock, Paper, Scissors
http://tumblingvice.blogspot.com/ - Tumbling Vice
http://bobgeiger.blogspot.com/ - BobGeiger (formerly Yellow Dog)
http://left-over.blogspot.com/ - Left-Over


Glossary for newcomers:

Chief of the Counterfeit Compassionate Conservative And Oh Yeah By The Way Conspicuously Caucasian Caucus = George W. Bush
Dither of Dolts = The Bush Administration and heads of agencies
Lint Twins = The Bush twins, who, like lint, are neither useful nor decorative
Shithead = Karl Rove.  To save typographer’s labor and print space, this combines the two soubriquets frequently applied to Mr. Rove: Bush’s Brain + Turd Blossom = Shithead 
XianXrazies  = Any group professing to be Christian which believes the faith excludes any of humanity from the hope it presumably offers since Christ’s sacrifice or which believes it has successfully learned to read God’s mind or which believes God wants followers who are drafted or gathered by impressment or which believes God hates or wants anyone else to hate those who do not believe in Him.
NEW: Ambulatory Emetic = Condi Rice, Secretary of State, aka the cacophagous, fawning bitch cur that slithers and crawls behind her master. A gourmand of whatever shit he deposits, she mixes it with her venomous digestive juices, then vomits it forth before the leaders of the world.
 

                                          —o0o—




A twilight tinge…

In his mock epic, Don Juan, Byron describes Lady Adeline Amundeville  as  a lady who “had a twilight tinge of blue,” could make epigrams, give delightful soirées, and was fond of making matches. 

Today I’m a bit blue-tinged myself, thanks to age and yesterday’s installment of the ongoing chemotherapy sessions.  And to the discovery yesterday that the latter have been gobbling up hemoglobin as well as cancerous cells.  So after having given up over the past few years a sufficient number of vials of blood to stock the drive-by window of a fast food joint catering to vampires, I face receiving a refill of two units of blood from a total stranger on Monday.  (I tried to pitch the very efficient idea of just leaving the blood in the donor and taking future testing vials from HIM, thus eliminating me as the middleman.  The idea was received coldly.)

I have, however, specified that I will not accept NeoCon or rabidly born-again fundamentalist I’m going to heaven and you’re not yah yah yah Christian blood.  The cancer is a sufficient enemy unto itself.  I don’t want an internal civil war giving it aid and comfort.

All that, however, is a personal problem.  What concerns me more is that my country is showing similar signs of age and ill-health, and it is not receiving any curative or palliative treatment.  On chemo days, I permit myself leisurely strolls down the less traveled pathways of my mind and indulge myself in commentary that is observational, rather than an effort to inform or persuade.  What follows is what I’ve encountered in my mental attic.

1.  XianXraziness and the end of the world

Part of our problem as a nation stems, I think, from “rabbit foot Christianity”, a matter I discussed in “God, the ultimate American rabbit’s foot” .  America prior to September 11, 2001, already had a scarcely hidden sense of superiority over anyone else on the planet as well as a sizable, loudly “Christian” population, made up in large part of some of the least educated and most poorly mentally endowed of the nation.  As Americans, they feel superior to the rest of the world. As “Christians”, they feel superior to other citizens of
America of any or no faith, as well as to other Christians.

Prior to September 11, the country also had a sense of invincibility, the Korean War, Viet Nam, and other “embarrassments” notwithstanding, because our police actions and wars were fought in the most desirable of all locations:  somewhere else, not here. 

The events of September 11 were in reality terrifying and horrible — not least because they didn’t happen somewhere else, not here..  For some professing Christianity, those events marked the beginning of the end predicted in the book of Revelation, seemed fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies, and fell in nicely with the claimed convictions of Mr. LaHaye and the Rapturists.    Americans might have a head start at salvation, apparently, but those who aren’t actively getting themselves born again in the prescribed fashion or who hold less rigid beliefs are in danger of being left behind or being stationed in hell.  There is suddenly a fair number of people who, like students doing extra work for credit, are eager to convert others even against their will — or to point gnarly, accusatory fingers at those who resist a particular “flavor” of salvation.

To those already more or less pre-programmed to accept the end of the world theory, September 11 added the purely terrified.  Life more than ever seems awfully fragile and the world frighteningly full of chaos.  Large numbers of people have found themselves sudden believers —  or have been suddenly reminded of faith which had been submerged for years beneath other concerns. 

This has probably occurred for the same reason primitive people have developed religions.  In a world where very little is within our personal control, it’s comforting to think that there is someone/something in charge, and — almost more importantly - that it is someone/something that can be placated by sacrifices and moonlight chants and dancing around fires, or by swinging censers and kneeling and giving up meat on Fridays, etc.

The next step, of course, is one in the direction of self-preservation.  If there is a someone/something that can be placated or charmed into turning wrath another way, it makes sense to point out to that someone/something that you, after all, aren’t nearly so bad as your neighbor — “take him first”. 

So for many, Christianity (never the most tolerant of faiths — ask Galileo!), especially  in this country, has begun to be very exclusionary and very resistant to the idea of universal salvation.  There has arisen a swelling contingent willing to point those gnarly, accusatory fingers at others.  Not sufficient for each man to be saved himself.  No, others must be damned for not following the prescribed path to safety.  It’s grown very ugly very fast, which suggests a predisposition to some unlovely character traits among some of us if it’s purely American and among some religious people generally if it isn’t.

I say all this from the point of view of a believer — though I’m not sure the God and Christ of my belief would be recognized by (or would recognize) Their counterparts among the kind of believers who call themselves “true”.  
I have always felt “true belief” must be judged by the object of the belief, and not by the professing believer.  I’ve noticed no sudden change in the migratory patterns of white doves, so I’m inclined to think some of those loudest in proclamations of faith may in fact have scared off the poor birds, which are now nesting quietly in the neighborhoods of those who believe their faith is between themselves and its object, rather than occasion for taking out billboard ads.

Perhaps none of this would have much significance except that the GOP’s strategists learned that the somewhat foggy-minded faithful can be easily manipulated.  Mouthing pieties and not being caught in flagrantly impious acts, particularly those containing a sexual component (it’s the not being caught that’s important), is about all it takes.  Thus, a Tom DeLay can be mouthing the set phrases of piety while lying, cheating, and stealing.  George Allen can be a loudly outspoken foe of abortion while investing in the stock of the only company which produces Plan B.  The stellar performer, of course, is the President himself.  The disparity between his pious professions and his pitiful performance is so very great that it suggests not hypocrisy, but delusion from which all reality has been barred.

Of course, all this is hugely odd.  Those most loudly professing their belief in God and their faith in their own salvation because they are born again and follow the :”truth” seem also to be those most easily manipulated by fear of the bad things that could happen to their bodies because of terrorists.  For a group so verbosely insistent on their love of God, they seem strangely reluctant to meet Him face to face.  .

I, of course, a believer by choice rather than overwhelming conviction, have fashioned for myself a win-win view of death:  There is no hell.  If God exists, He has accepted Christ’s sacrifice for all of us – so we are all likely to be unchallenged immigrants at Heaven’s border, even if there is a “work for citizenship” program before ultimate acceptance into that kingdom.  If there is no God, even more assuredly there is no hell and no continuation of consciousness.  I’ll be unaware I’m dead…or of anything else.  I can’t lose.

Personally, I’ve always considered myself a basically adorable person, and I can’t help feeling that my death will be a great waste of materials whose utility has been not quite exhausted yet.  But except for that blow to vanity, I see no real reason for fearing it – though I’d obviously prefer to remain where I am for now.  As for being blown up by terrorists, I’m against it.  I like to think I’d have been against the efforts to sauté Galileo, too (our side did that) and dunk suspected witches, too.  At least as certain as “the poor you have always with you” is the corollary “the crazies you have always with you”.  I don’t think there are any valid guarantees of safety from them, certainly not from the Chief of the Counterfeit Compassionate Conservative and Oh Yeah By The Way Conspicuously Caucasian Caucus and his Dither of Dolts.  (In fact, I lie awake some nights, worrying about the fact that Mr. Cheney and Mr. Rumsfeld and Mr. Gonzales have anything at all to do with “protecting” me.)

Aside:  I am touched by the concern of the self-titled Christians for my credit and love-life.  I daily receive several e-mails from “Christian lenders” and from firms offering me the company of “Christian singles”.  Being one of those annoying “all interest is usury” types, I consider “Christian lender” an oxymoron of sorts.  As for “Christian singles”, I doubt meeting me would solve any problems they have, and I’m certain meeting them would cure none of mine.  For me, this suggests the same kind of mind-set that would advertise the opportunity to meet “blue-eyed singles” — a rather odd basis on which to choose friends or lovers.

2.  The NeoCon stick-up men

It is becoming harder and harder for me not to be something of a conspiracy-sniffer. With regard to what we’re told by the Administration and its close friends here and abroad, I fear we are definitely deep into once burned, twice shy territory.

Ultimately, for the victims — whether in Iraq or Israel or Lebanon or aboard a transAtlantic flight or in any other location presently embattled —  I’m not sure it matters if their untimely and horrible demises are the product of ineptitude or evil intention. But it ought to matter to us survivors.  If we have allowed our government to become, or to ally itself with nations that have become, so hopelessly inept OR so unremorsefully evil, it’s definitely time to take to the battlements.  If they use bogey-men terrorists, real or imagined, to frighten us into compliance and into giving up everything we presumably are fighting to defend against them, shame on us for permitting it.

Mr. Bush speaks of Islamofascists, but from his policies and behavior, it would seem that it is the “Islamo” part, rather than the “fascist” part that alarms him.  And he seems to fail even yet to make a connection between this nation’s policies, past and present, and the efforts to blow us up.  God knows there are pure crazies on all sides, and probably nothing can predict or control their behavior.  But there are also many, many more who are open to the seductive arguments of the crazies because they have suffered hurt and injustice from us. 

It’s particularly tragic, given these uncertain times, that for many of us, the first response to our own government and its friends is doubt. It is terrible to admit that my first thought on hearing of the alleged terrorist plot foiled by the British was, “Talk about timing!” — the defeat of Democrat hawk Lieberman, the embattled position of Bush and Blair on the Iraqi war and the MidEast war, and voila! the almost magical appearance of a deus ex machina from Mr. Bush’s strongest ally to throw the unthinking masses into a paroxysm of (a) fear and (b) gratitude to a leadership willing to protect them at the very small price of their decency, the rule of law, and the civil liberties they’ve enjoyed.  The Administration and its supporters, always eager to chastise others for “politicizing” events, are already attempting to regain lost ground by doing just that:  Trust us, only we can keep you safe. 

I dismiss the conspiracy idea as too outrageous to be true — but it DID occur to me.  A government can’t be doing everything right if an ordinary Joe Blow citizen like me can entertain such thoughts, even for a moment.  We have been lied to — or led up and down garden paths by an Administration which denies it lies but which, if it has not deliberately lied, has shown towering ineptitude at almost every level.

Ultimately, Mr. Bush continues to say “trust me”, long after most of us have learned the hard way that trusting him is not a good policy.  And while I recognize that there ARE bred-in-the-bone crazies (on both sides of each and every war) and that everyone is at risk from them, I deny that we can be kept safe from them by ceding the rule of law, our civil liberties, or basic decency — that latter, a quality as likely to be found among the secular population as among the believers of any faith. 

Thus far the Administration is guilty of being stick-up men: Your liberty or your life! replacing the old Your money or your life!  They deny wrong-doing when challenged, but then exert influence on Congress (conveniently under the control of their supporters) to pass retro-active laws legalizing the actions they claim have always been legal.  The mind reels…

3.  Etc.

Selling bridges and road built at public expense to private foreign companies; seeking retroactive protection for criminal acts by government; refusal to condemn and abolish torture; efforts to undermine the rule of law; negating duly passed law by signing statements; protecting the interests of business and industry at the expense of the environment and private citizens; creating a widening gulf between the haves and the have-lesses; placing party loyalty above duty to the nation; appointing loyal cronies of questionable ability to posts with direct effect on the safety of the nation and its inhabitants; substitution of blurry-minded “faith” for verifiable science; a resurgence of racism and religious intolerance; wars which may never end and which are maiming and killing “other people’s children” at a horrific rate, etc., etc.

Yeah, there’s a lot more to worry about than cancer and vanishing hemoglobin!



Posted by xristim in 20:34:56 | Permalink | Comments (10)